SUBREGION NOA

BACKGROUND FOR THE CROP

 

In this season, the producers had little incentives for sowing. As a result of the scarce water stored in soil profiles due to a strong and long draught during summer and a part of autumn, many producers decided not to sow wheat.

Although April presented rains, they were not enough for sowing; therefore, only nearly the half of the area was sown, according to the zones. Some departments virtually did not plant wheat. Many crops were lost due to lack of moisture and, in general, it was a very difficult season.

As a consequence of little incentives for sowing wheat, many producers looked for more profitable productions, and in this sense chickpea crop was selected and its area was significantly increased. The few wheat planted crops reached flowering with almost no water in soil, therefore yields were very low, erratic and in some cases with no harvest at all.

As every year, there were presence of diseases such as Yellow Spot (Drechslera tritici repentis) and little Leaf Rust (Puccinia triticina Erikss).

There were some aphids, thrips and mites, mainly due to drought environmental.

In general, only few crops reached yields around 1000 kg/ha; and coincided with the early planted ones, in late April. The rest had very erratic results, with very low yields. However, baking quality was good to very good, with very acceptable levels of gluten and test weights.

MAP OF THE SUBREGION

 
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSES

 
WHEAT ANALYSIS PARAMETERS MINIMUM MAXIMUM AVERAGE STANDARD DEVIATION VARIATION COEFFICIENT
Test Weight (kg/hl)78,1583,05 81,061,221,51
Total Damaged Kernels (%)0,020,44 0,16 0,11 70,03
Foreign Material (%)0,570,82 0,72 0,08 11,50
Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%)0,261,12 0,62 0,26 41,40
Yellow Berry Kernels (%)0,003,22 1,17 0,86 73,81
Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%)11,613,8 12,9 0,75,12
Protein (S.S.S) (%)15,0 16,6 15,6 0,5 3,90
Weight of 1000 Kernels (gr.)27,08 33,30 30,931,695,45
Ash (% dry basis) (%)1,846 2,029 1,944 0,067 3,42
Total damaged kernels include 0.05% green kernels, 0.01% frosty kernels, 0.04% sprouted kernels and 0.05% insect chewed kernels.

GRADE DISTRIBUTION



FLOUR ANALYSIS PARAMETERS MINIMUM MAXIMUM AVERAGE STANDARD DEVIATION VARIATION COEFFICIENT
MILLINGWet Gluten (%)26,9 37,9 32,7 3,0 9,05
Dry Gluten (%)10,014,0 12,1 1,18,95
Falling Number (sec.)393451 421 153,60
Flour Yield(%)62,971,1 69,0 2,4 3,46
Ash (dry basis) (%)0,571 0,822 0,731 0,060 8,22
FARINOGRAM Water Absorption(14 % H°) (%)61,264,0 62,1 0,81,24
Development Time (min.)6,212,9 9,5 1,920,08
Stability (min.)5,9 16,3 11,5 3,1 27,44
Degree of Softening (12 min.)50 101 66 1522,30
P (mm)78109 94 10 10,19
ALVEOGRAM
L (mm)61120 93 15 16,44
W Joules x 10-4211376 289 42 14,64
P / L0,691,67 1,01 0,28 26,51
These results were elaborated with 11 composite samples prepared proportionally from 93 primary samples (farmer deliveries)
 

SUBREGION DATA

In this sub region the wheat production was 388,987 tons., the 4.7% of the national total. Were sampled 44,000 tons., the 11.31% of the sub region production.

 

APPENDIX OF LOCALITY COMPOSITE SAMPLES
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION WHEAT ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NUMBER LOCALITY, DISTRICT OR DEPARTMENT TONNAJE GRADE TEST WEIGT (Kg/hl) TOTAL DAMAGED KERNELS(%) FOREIGN MATERIAL (%) SHRUNKEN AND BROKEN KERNELS
(%)
YELLOW BERRY KERNELS (%) PROTEIN
MOISTURE 13,5 % H°)
PROTEIN
(s/S.S.S.)
WEIGT OF 1000 KERNELS (gr.)
ASH(dry basis) %
1Burruyacú/Cruz Alta/Leales4000281,250,440,620,501,4212,815,631,481,857
2La Cocha/Granero4000281,050,060,800,521,3812,130,7230,721,846
3Dto. Jimenez4000280,600,200,760,700,5613,516,029,321,990
4Dto. Jimenez4000281,250,200,641,100,0013,830,1630,161,924
5Dto. Pellegrini4000380,800,180,820,621,2212,930,3630,361,925
6Robles/Guasayán4000278,150,100,681,121,4212,830,3627,081,996
7 Anta 4000283,050,100,570,531,5813,230,9730,971,952
8Anta4000280,600,230,670,5312,312,931,3131,312,011
9Orán4000282,400,200,800,260,0012,930,3632,602,012
10Metán4000282,150,180,820,621,2212,930,3630,361,925
11Cerrillos4000280,350,020,760,503,2211,630,3633,301,846

APPENDIX OF LOCALITY COMPOSITE SAMPLES
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FLOUR ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NUMBER LOCALITY,
DISTRICT OR DEPARTMENT
WET GLUTEN(%) DRY GLUTEN(%) FALLING NUMBER (sec.) FLOUR YIELD(%) FARINOGRAM ALVEOGRAM ASH(dry basis)(%)
D. T. (min.) STABILITY (min.) DEGREE SOFTENING(12 min.) P L W P/L
1Pampa del Infierno30,711,447568,860,410,317,443102792951,290,842
2Pampa del Infierno35,213,047568,260,911,315,957101893181,130,950
3Roque Saens Peña32,512,040371,161,212,819,44511,4783311,460,819
4Hermoso Campo30,511,343671,060,310,917,344125783541,600,818
5Dto. Alberdi32,612,141471,363,27,97,78090992930,910,775