SUBREGION NEA

BACKGROUND FOR THE CROP

 

In the campaign 2011 the abundant rains occurred towards the end of summer caused delayed in the sowing by excess moisture in the soil profile, affecting the planting of long cycles and concentrated between mid June and beginning of July, with planting short cycles.

At tillering and to the end of the vegetative stage, the water and temperature conditions were normal for that environment. But in the reproductive stage, mainly some 20 to 30 days before anthesis, the period when the number of grains is determined, the water deficit was significant, in addition to late frosts in September that caused the loss of more advanced lots. Rains normalized during the stage of grain filling, towards the end of September and beginning of October.

The tendency of monthly average temperature was similar to the historical series, reaching in average the 15.5° C during the stage of the grain number definition. Furthermore, there were short periods of 2 to 3 days with high temperature amplitude reaching and surpassing the 27ºC to 30º C of average maximum temperature and low temperatures registered during the night.

The sanitary condition of the crop was generally good, although in some areas there was high incidence of yellow spot (Drechslera tritici-repentis), but low incidence of leaf rust (Puccinia triticina). stem rust (Puccinia graminis) was also observed in several genotypes. As pests, there sometimes severe incidence of aphids and thrips.

Yields dropped by 30 - 35 % as regard the prior campaign. The lack of rains during the period of grain number definition was the main environmental factor affecting the crop, and therefore the production.

The hectares that were lost due to frost and hail in few cases.

MAP OF THE SUBREGION

 
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSES

 
WHEAT ANALYSIS PARAMETERS MINIMUM MAXIMUM AVERAGE STANDARD DEVIATION VARIATION COEFFICIENT
Test Weight (kg/hl)75,1083,05 79,462,533,19
Total Damaged Kernels (%)0,44 0,58 0,25 0,19 77,48
Foreign Material (%)0,08 1,96 0,55 0,49 89,87
Shrunken and Broken Kernels (%)0,32 1,46 0,68 0,31 45,61
Yellow Berry Kernels (%)0,00 10,76 2,77 3,41 123,20
Protein (13,5% Moisture) (%)9,7 12,8 11,5 0,7 6,43
Protein (S.S.S) (%)11,3 14,8 13,3 0,7 6,43
Weight of 1000 Kernels (gr.)27,60 33,59 30,15 1,81 6,01
Ash (% dry basis)(%)1,818 2,123 2,022 0,080 3,97
Total damaged kernels includes 0.04% green kernels, 0.02% frosty kernels, 0.04% sprouted kernels and 0.15% insect chewed kernels.

GRADE DISTRIBUTION



FLOUR ANALYSIS PARAMETERS MINIMUM MAXIMUM AVERAGE STANDARD DEVIATION VARIATION COEFFICIENT
MILLINGWet Gluten (%)21,629,2 25,9 2,4 9,25
Dry Gluten (%)7,9 11,0 9,2 1,0 10,57
Falling Number (seg.)411 512 445 31 6,86
Flour Yield(%)67,5 72,5 70,1 1,6 2,26
Ash (dry basis) (%)0,561 0,795 0,722 0,063 8,69
FARINOGRAM Water Absorption(14 % H°) (%)54,7 62,5 59,3 2,1 3,60
Development Time (min.)7,9 27,2 13,85,0 36,28
Stability (min.)11,0 45,2 20,8 8,8 42,26
Degree of Softening (12 min.)12 67 41 1535,97
P (mm)100156 1171513,14
ALVEOGRAM
L (mm)50 945 749 16 21,67
W Joules x 10-4252 393 315 36 11,53
P / L1,12 3,12 1,59 0,63 36,66
These results were elaborated with 15 composite samples prepared proportionally from 198 primary samples (farmer deliveries).
 

SUBREGION DATA

In this sub region the wheat production was 1,092,980 tons., the 8.4% of the national total. Were sampled 60,180 tons., the 5.5% of the sub region production.

 

APPENDIX OF LOCALITY COMPOSITE SAMPLES
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION WHEAT ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NUMBER LOCALITY, DISTRICT OR DEPARTMENT TONNAJE GRADE TEST WEIGT (Kg/hl) TOTAL DAMAGED KERNELS(%) FOREIGN MATERIAL (%) SHRUNKEN AND BROKEN KERNELS
(%)
YELLOW BERRY KERNELS(%) PROTEIN (MOISTURE 13,5 % H°) PROTEIN
(s/S.S.S.)
WEIGT OF 1000 KERNELS (gr.) ASH(dry basis)(%)
14Chaco3750375,100,500,420,620,0012,114,229,802,089
15Chaco4020278,100,560,240,820,0011,413,232,102,031
16Chaco3980278,100,200,120,400,0011,413,227,602,037
17Chaco4210375,700,580,661,460,0012,814,828,802,123
18Chaco3900277,100,120,140,900,0011,112,830,102,017
19Santiago del Estero4320276,000,540,080,740,0012,414,330,002,039
1Burruyacú4000281,050,200,521,040,5611,713,528,721,864
2Cruz Alta / Leales4000283,050,080,180,883,1011,913,829,861,818
3La Cocha / Simoca4000281,700,080,160,741,0412,214,131,491,959
4Anta4000282,600,320,360,569,0811,813,628,032,035
5 Anta4000381,250,081,160,4010,7611,212,929,042,024
5 Anta4000381,250,081,160,4010,7611,212,929,042,024
6 Anta4000281,250,220,680,404,7611,813,628,162,087
7 Orán4000F/E79,450,081,960,443,2410,612,333,102,079
8 Orán4000379,900,041,040,326,3610,812,533,592,061
9 Cerrillos / Metán4000281,700,120,520,362,769,811,331,842,063

APPENDIX OF LOCALITY COMPOSITE SAMPLES
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FLOUR ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NUMBER LOCALITY, DISTRICT OR DEPARTMENT WET GLUTEN (%) DRY GLUTEN(%) FALLING NUMBER (sec.) FLOUR YIELD(%) FARINOGRAM ALVEOGRAM ASH(dry basis)(%)
% WA (14 % H°) D. T.(min.) STABILITY (min.) DEGREE SOFTENING(12 min.) P L W P/L
14Chaco27,69,543670,357,810,520,432100883211,140,705
15Chaco24,38,144068,061,111,116,842124713331,750,715
16Chaco23,07,948970,854,727,245,212113572771,980,705
17Chaco26,98,950271,658,313,325,125103803231,290,795
18Chaco24,58,351270,356,19,620,930112532522,110,785
19Santiago del Estero29,19,944172,560,77,912,0561068483041,260,785
1Burruyacú29,211,042571,861,38,811,067103923081,120,733
2Cruz Alta / Leales28,010,341172,062,311,314,648114763031,500,691
3La Cocha / Simoca27,610,345370,459,610,613,652102802841,280,561
4Anta27,310,243170,459,715,819,845117933901,260,780
5Anta23,48,544769,759,916,321,941156503283,120,756
6Anta26,59,942170,559,916,320,548115943931,220,695
7Orán22,38,241467,557,520,033,121138533032,600,665
8Orán21,68,143167,958,117,925,732138502882,760,790
9Cerrillos / Metán26,49,742067,762,510,411,758113813111,400,654